​Proposal for Balancing the U.S. Budget and Reducing the National Debt

Background:

The current U.S. gross national debt stands at approximately $31.5 trillion (at the time of this proposal), and the annual deficit is around $1.4 trillion. To address this issue, we propose a comprehensive plan that balances the budget starting in 2026 and gradually reduces the national debt through a combination of economic growth and tax reform.

Plan Outline:

Balancing the Budget by 2026:

Our proposal aims to eliminate the annual deficit by implementing a combination of the following measures:

• Promoting economic growth: Encourage a favorable business climate, invest in infrastructure, and support innovation to stimulate the economy and increase government revenue.

• Reviewing and optimizing government spending: Conduct a thorough analysis of federal spending and identify areas where efficiencies can be achieved without compromising essential services.

• Implementing tax reform: Introduce a value-added tax (VAT) with a broad tax base to generate additional revenue while maintaining a competitive corporate tax rate.

Reducing the National Debt:

Once the budget is balanced, focus on reducing the national debt through the following actions:

• Allocating the VAT revenue towards debt repayment: As proposed, a 3.88% VAT would generate approximately $875 billion in annual revenue, which could be used to pay down the national debt over 36 years, provided the budget remains balanced.

• Continuous monitoring and adjustment: Regularly assess the effectiveness of the implemented measures and adjust the plan as necessary to ensure progress towards debt reduction goals.

• Legislating a specific purpose for VAT revenue: To ensure the Value Added Tax (VAT) fulfills its intended purpose of deficit reduction, legally mandate that VAT revenue be allocated exclusively for this purpose. Furthermore, once the deficit is eliminated, the VAT will be automatically repealed, preventing it from becoming a permanent tax burden on the American people.

Conclusion:

By balancing the budget and implementing a VAT tax, the U.S. can address its deficit and national debt issues while maintaining a pro-growth environment. This proposal presents a clear and practical solution to the country's financial challenges and promotes long-term economic stability.

Additionally, a Value Added Tax (VAT) is an inherently fair and equitable solution that aligns with the principles of progressive taxation. Since VAT is based on consumption, individuals with lower disposable incomes, who consume less, will pay a lower amount of tax. Conversely, those with higher disposable incomes, who have the means to consume more, will contribute a higher amount in taxes.

This inherent fairness in the VAT structure ensures that the tax burden is distributed proportionately according to individuals' ability to pay. Consequently, not only does the implementation of a VAT promote long-term economic stability, but it also fosters a more equitable society where everyone contributes to the betterment of the nation's financial health in a balanced manner.

We request that Congress consider our proposal and engage in further discussions on its implementation. Together, we can work towards a more fiscally responsible and prosperous future for the United States.

​​

​The Math:

If the U.S. government were to balance its budget starting in 2026, the focus would shift from paying off the annual deficit to reducing the accumulated national debt. In this scenario, a VAT tax could still be used to generate additional revenue to gradually pay off the existing debt.

Assuming the national debt remains at around $31.5 trillion, and we aim to pay it off over a 36-year period, we can calculate the required VAT rate in a similar manner:

Required VAT Rate = (Annual Payment / GDP) / (1 - GDP Growth Rate)

Annual Payment = $31.5 trillion / 36 years ≈ $875 billion

Required VAT Rate = ($875 billion / $23 trillion) / (1 - 0.02) ≈ 0.0388 or 3.88%

​

Again, this is a simplified common sense calculation that assumes a consistent GDP growth rate and does not account for potential economic fluctuations, changes in tax policies, or adjustments in government spending. Moreover, implementing a new tax may have various economic implications, and the actual impact of a VAT on the U.S. economy would need to be carefully analyzed and considered.

Achieving a balanced budget is a challenging task that requires a combination of economic growth, careful budget management, and potential tax reforms. Nonetheless, under this hypothetical scenario, a 3.88% VAT could be a part of the solution to reduce the national debt gradually.

​

Sincerely,

Jay Bowman